I agree that SketchUp for example allows for proxy imports and the ability to set the grass height, compared to having only keywords for this in Revit - this may very well change in the future though.īut, as I gather from your post, it's more about a frustration with the way Revit works, right? If so, then this is also understandable - I know a lot of people who use Revit successfully in their daily lives without any problems, but on the w algreenslistens other hand we also have a lot of users which prefer SketchUp. Still, it's not our goal to add more and more exclusive functionalities and leave Revit behind, not at all the case. I understand your concerns and it does in the end boil down to a matter of preference whether Enscape will be used with Revit, SketchUp, or even ArchiCAD/Rhino. i'm too using revit and i have this problem Generally, render quality in sketchup is better than revit. or even number of Revit/SketchUp Enscape tutorials on YouTube Have you seen the amount of bad examples of Revit-Enscape renderings and scenes, ugh. This is probably a tread for Revit forum but is it just me or are there other jelly or frustrated Revit users out there? This has probably something to do with Revit being a massive dinosaur that is as great to work with as an architect, but it lacks the lightness and finess for concept and illustrations. One thing that I have noticed is that Sketchup Enscape is getting more powerful and with more options that Revit version. Even thou more powerful then Enscape this max-vray solution is way more time consuming and more complicated than staying in Revit and illustrating with Enscape. As a Revit user I was working with 3Ds max and Vray as an addition and render solution. So again, I would like to point out that Enscape is extremely cool and powerful tool that is greatly appreciated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |